March 18, 2008

My Brother's Keeper?

This is a major pet peeve with me.  Let us see the latest misrepresentation of this phrase from one of our wonderful politicians:

"In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world's great religions demand -- that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper."

GAH!

The phrase "my brother's keeper" exists in one place and one place only in the Bible.  It's in Genesis:


"And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.

And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?

And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground."


Wha't going on here?  Cain is lying to God.  He knows damn well where his brother is and he's lying about it.  To God.  This has always been fascinating to me and speaks to what I consider to be a huge problem on the Left today (the "reality based community" my foot).

There is no implication in this passage which indicates that we are or should be "our brother's keeper".  The phrase is simply there to indicate the bold-faced nature of the lie that is being told by the murderer Cain.

Jesus never used the phrase.  It doesn't appear anywhere else in the Bible, and the word "keeper" doesn't even appear in the New Testament in the New International Version.  The King James version uses the word 'keeper' for 'guard' and so it shows up there, but not in this context and certainly not in the context of a sermon that we should be "our brother's keepers".

This disgusting perversion of meaning by religious illiterates pretending to be men of deep and abiding faith really chaps my unmentionables.  And yes, I'm talking about Obama here, but he's hardly the first politician to pull this crap.  I imagine it is more common on the Left since they are always looking for another excuse to steal from us, but I'm sure some RINO has done it too.

Just stop it, it bugs me.

Posted by: l4n3 at 06:24 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 398 words, total size 3 kb.

Obama's excuses

And that's what this speech today was really about, excusing the racism of his friend and spiritual guide.

Oh, those things he said are wrong and divisive, but you must understand WHY he said them...

Actually, no we must not.  Every racist has an excuse, everyone has a story.  From firefighters and cops in the inner cities of this country, to crime victims of one stripe or another, all of us have excuses to slide into racism.  And all of us are wrong when we do, even black people.

There is no excuse for racism, if you want a nation where people are judged by the Content of Their Character; you can't stand in front of a room full of people saying whitey is trying to exterminate you, even if you had to sit in the back of the bus when you were a kid, even if you were beaten by the Klan.

If all the white victims of black criminals were allowed to become racist, then where would we be?  If we didn't care about David Duke's life history (and we didn't and we shouldn't have), then why the hell do I care about Reverend Whyte's?

I don't.  And I hope no one else does either.

This was a shallow and sad attempt to brush over the real problem of his racist reverend and the even bigger problem of the racist ideology that feeds him and his followers.  Yes I know the pronouns in that sentence have ambiguous antecedents, and I kind of like it that way.  Because that's the question now, how much of this racism does Obama actually believe?

He disavows in general the horrible things his pastor says, but not specifically.  Maybe Obama doesn't think his pastor should say Whitey is spreading AIDS in the Black community.  Why not specifically disavow that statement?  Why not say, "The CIA did not introduce crack into the inner cities of America to poison Black youths."  Nope.  It's "his controversial statements are wrong and divisive." Which are controversial?  It's left to the listener to decide.  Which are disavowed?  Again, nothing specific, you decide which are controversial and therefore which are wrong.  If you believe Rev. Wright, then his thoughts on AIDS and crack and "chickens coming home to roost" are not controversial and not disowned.

Will this open a debate on Black Liberation Theology and how much of that Racist Ideology Obama believes in?  I hope so, but I don't think that was the point.  The point was to bury it, say the Black man has grievances so you should excuse his racism, and electing Obama is the only way to prove you aren't racist.

Color me disgusted.

 Also, pop on over to protein wisdom and read this .


Posted by: l4n3 at 06:08 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 461 words, total size 3 kb.

<< Page 1 of 1 >>
12kb generated in CPU 0.0138, elapsed 0.0311 seconds.
33 queries taking 0.0188 seconds, 50 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.